Wednesday, October 31, 2007
inquiry project and article
Survey questions?
1) Do you feel like you are a skilled writer?
2)On a scale of 1 to 5 (five being the best) how would you rate your reading level?
3)On a Scale of 1 to 5 (five being the best) how would you rate your writing?
4)Do you think that there is a correlation between reading and writing?
5)Do you think that people who read a lot are naturally better writers than people that don't read as much?
in class 10/31/07
Whom could I talk to who could provide me with information that has factness about this question?
I know a few teachers at different grade levels. I think that one teacher would be more educated on the topic. He is an English teacher for high school students; he also has a Masters Degree in reading strategies. This weekend he is going to a reading conference and I have asked to interview him on the topic. Since this topic revolves around everything he teaches and has studied I think that he will have strong opinions about the topic.
What could I read that would provide me with information that has factness about this question?
I can read articles by theorists that have opposing views on the subject. One might say that reading is directly correlated with writing while others may disagree. Perhaps there have been newspaper articles that have covered this topic, or certain researchers that have tried to tackle the correlation have written studies on the topic
What else could I do besides talk to people and read to acquire information or factness about this question? (Jolliffe 75)
I would like to observe some of the class rooms and see how reading and writing are being taught. Do teachers teach both reading and writing together or are they separate entities all together. I would also like to create a survey about the topic and see if everyday people that don’t teach composition or reading think that there is a link between the two.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Inquiry project
Crystal Vela
English 401
October 29, 2007
The general public would be interested in my topic because it might motivate parents to read more to their children, if they knew that it would help their kids later in life in all aspects. I think that the general public will question if there is a correlation and if there is does it matter. They might just have general questions like why does this matter. On the other hand I think that scholarly community would question if there was a correlation. They would also ask if it mattered what a person read. Do people that read scholarly work all the time write well? I think that the general public and a scholarly discourse community would have different questions for the most part. I think that people generally believe that if you read a lot then you will be able to write well. However people believe that if you are well read you will be able to write in all areas, academic, business and creative, perhaps this is not true. I think that it is a little too early to write about the expectations of certain texts articles.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Professing Mulitculturalism
Monday, October 22, 2007
Inital Thoughts on Inquiry Project
Part I: Exploration
1. Identify the issue or problem that you plan to focus on in your Inquiry Project.
I want to focus on Latino students and literacy. I want to know why they are not excelling in that subject and find if there are ways to improve the situation
2. What is your personal connection to and interest in this topic?
I am a Latina student and when I was younger I was in ESL and found that we never spoke English in the class, only Spanish. I also have very important people in my life that do not read very well and they think that it is because they weren't taught the right way. They say that their experience in ESL class was not completely beneficial because it allowed them to hang on to Spanish and not achieve high standards in literacy.
3. What opinions do you already hold about this topic?
I feel that their is a problem with how minorities are being taught to read when you can go into a low income school with a high Latino population and you find that many of them cannot write or read at their grade level.
4. What knowledge do you already have about this topic. What are your main questions about this topic? What are you most curious about?
I don't have a lot of knowledge on the topic. My basic information is that I have seen this happen first hand and I know people that are not at the level they should be at in reading because they were put in programs where it was fine to speak Spanish and only learn the basics of English. I want to find out what are the problems and see if there are any new strategies on how to teach Latinos literacy. I want to see what programs are in place to teach literacy to Latinos and try to understand why it is not working. Basically what are the problems.
6. How might composition theorists and researchers approach or study this topic? Does this approach differ from those of other related disciplines (such as communication studies)?
I think that a composition theorist and reacher's would try to do a study on Latino students in different situations and see if they excel or not. For example does a student that is in a low income school not as literate as a Latino student in a school that has no funding problems?
7. How could you research this topic outside the library (for example, through interviews and/or observations)?
I think that there are books out there that I can look at. Perhaps there are some articles on the subject.
Part II: Focusing
Write an initial claim, or an open-ended question, to guide your research on this topic. Make it specific but exploratory. Remember that a good claim opens up an area of inquiry about a topic; a claim should invite evidence, support, and debate.
I want to know why Latino students are not excelling in reading and what are some ways to improve the situation.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Out Of Place
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
When the First Voice You Hear is Not Your Own
I found Royster's article to be a bit confusing. I thought that the article was more about communication than writing. She thinks that people writing about people within a certain community or the community as whole could be a problem. This does not just exist between boarders or countries but in races and religion. Royster's three scenes seems to work together to try to show that we need better our communication in order to be understood in other communities. She says that there is a possibility to make a universal discourse but I think that she is trying to say that people are poor communicators in general. People are more concerned with talking and not listening. As I said before I didn't understand this article to it's fullest, but this is what I gathered form the article.
Monday, October 15, 2007
What We Need to Know About Writing
In Bizzell's article"What We Need to Know about Writing" that the writing problem is a thinking problem. She goes on to say that we think students come up with their own ideas and just need a little help putting those ideas into words. Those students that came up with better ideas were simply smarter students. The students that did not have great ideas were just not as bright as the other students and therefore needed to be exposed to good models of writing. This reminds me of Perl's article with the experienced and unexperienced writers. Perl stated that unexperienced writers were not looking at the whole picture when writing and revising a paper. Unexperienced writers need to overcome grammar and focus on the purpose of the paper. When it comes to inner directed and outer-directed theories I would have to say that I think I understand the outter-directed theory better. It makes sense that discourse communities would impact your writing. Even though you belong to a certain community that does not limit you to one area of that community. You can have a family conversation and a work conversation and even though the topics will vary it does not mean that the discourse came from two different places.